Among contact lens wearers there remains a significant interest in extended
wear. Many contact lens patients would like to eliminate or reduce the
amount of time spent on lens care. Refractive surgery is a viable option
for some of these patients, but it is not for everyone. The number of contact
lens wearers has increased from approximately 25,000,000 to 30,000,000
over the last few years as has the number of refractive surgical procedures
(to just under a total of one-half million). Although refractive surgery
has grown, it has not had a significant impact on the contact lens market.
Extended wear remains an area of interest among contact lens investigators.
But alongside the attraction to extended wear, there remains a fear of
the potential complications, particularly ulcerative keratitis. The landmark
articles1,2 that brought to our attention the association of ulcerative
keratitis with overnight wear of contact lenses have instilled a cautiousness
in both practitioners and patients. In the last 15 years our knowledge
of the complications associated with extended wear has greatly increased.
In general terms, there appears to be two areas that must be addressed
for successful extended wear. One is the relationship of the contact lens
with the ocular surface and the other is the oxygen transmissibility of
the contact lens.
The introduction of disposable contact lenses has decreased the incidence
of ocular surface problems (i.e., decreasing lens deposit formation and
subsequent spoilage of the contact lens, thus decreasing the irritative
or immunological effect on the conjunctival and corneal surfaces). Studies
by Poggio and Abelson,3 Hamano and coworkers,4 and Boswall and coworkers5
have shown that the complications associated with conventional contact
lens wear such as itching, burning, dryness, blurred vision, and foreign
body sensation are significantly decreased in disposable contact lens wear.
In addition, the incidence of giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC) with
disposable extended wear is reduced compared with conventional extended
wear. In this issue of The CLAO Joumal, Porazinski and Donshik report that
the incidence of GPC is significantly reduced in patients who replace their
contact lenses at intervals of 3 weeks or less compared with individuals
who replace their contact lenses at intervals of 4 weeks or longer. Thus,
the frequent replacement of the contact lens appears to be beneficial to
the ocular surface.
However, a serious potential complication of extended wear contact
lenses is the development of ulcerative keratitis. Important studies by
Schein and associates1 demonstrated that the relative risk for ulcerative
keratitis was 10-15 times higher with overnight wear of soft contact lenses
compared with daily wear. Poggio and associates2 in a corollary study demonstrated
that the annualized incidence of ulcerative keratitis with soft contact
lenses was 20.9 per 10,000 for extended wear compared with 4.1 per 10,000
for daily wear. The introduction of disposable contact lenses did not appear
to affect the overall incidence of ulcerative keratitis. Studies by Poggio
and Abelson3 and Nilsson and Montan6,7 showed that the overall incidence
of ulcerative keratitis was similar for both disposable and conventional
extended wear lenses. However, in both studies, the data appear to suggest
that the severity of ulcerative keratitis was much less with disposable
compared to conventional extended wear contact lenses. Ulcerative keratitis
with disposable lenses occurred more often in the peripheral cornea rather
than in the central cornea.3,6,7 In addition, it appeared that the organisms
responsible for ulcerative keratitis in patients wearing disposable contact
lenses were more likely to be gram-positive rather than gram-negative bacteria.8,9
It it not clear yet how the use of new, ultra-high-Dk lenses for extended
wear will affect this picture.
In 1994, Hamano and coworkers4 reported on complications induced by
conventional and disposable contact lenses in Japan. There were no ulcers
reported during this study. The major complication was superficial punctate
keratitis, with the lowest rate of complications in the daily disposable
soft contact lens group of patients (2.5%). Disposable extended wear lenses
had an overall complication rate of only 4.9%, which was lower than the
complication rate for both conventional soft contact lenses and RGP contact
lenses.
The other important factor that has to be considered in extended wear
is corneal hypoxia. First, contact lens associated corneal hypoxia increases
Pseudomonas adherence to exfoliated epithelial cells from the human cornea.10,11
Second, the cornea needs enough oxygen to conduct its normal metabolic
processes. Thus, the introduction of ultra-high-Dk soft contact lenses
should eliminate the contact lens associated hypoxia and decrease or eliminate
the factors responsible for Pseudomonas binding. Thus, this should decrease
the conditions conducive to developing Pseudomonas ulcerative keratitis.
Another finding that has been noted in extended wear contact lenses
is the occurrence of central corneal thinning. In this issue, Ren and coworkers
have shown that extended wear of RGP contact lenses in the rabbit model
significantly decreases central corneal epithelial proliferation. They
hypothesized that contact lens related hypoxia may be responsible for this
inhibition. While the central epithelial proliferation is decreased, corneal
limbal and conjunctival epithelial cells show active proliferation perhaps
in an attempt to compensate for the suppression of the central area. This
raises the question, as proposed by the authors, that extended wear may
continually stimulate limbal stem cells, which may have a deleterious affect
with long-time extended wear. The clinical question that has to be answered
is whether this phenomena occurs in individuals wearing extended wear contact
lenses. Is it related to frequency of contact lens replacement, i.e., whether
a lens is worn continuously for 1 week, 2 weeks or 4 weeks? Does the stimulation
for proliferation continue after adaptation of the contact lens? Is there
a new, regulatory mechanism that may then decrease the stimulus for proliferation,
or does proliferation continue and have a potential adverse affect for
the long-term health of the cornea.
As we approach the millenium, we look back and see that there have
been tremendous advances in the field of contact lenses in general and
in extended wear in particular. The advent of disposable contact lenses
for both daily as well as extended wear has significantly reduced the complications
associated with contact lens wear, has decreased the number of patients
who have dropped out of contact lenses, and has been one of the major factors
for increasing the number of contact lens wearers. The introduction of
high-Dk soft lenses for both daily wear and extended wear is an important
contribution and has the potential for making extended wear even safer.
The correct schedule of wearing time and lens replacement has yet to be
determined. Further studies are necessary to give us the data to make these
decisions and meet our patients' expectations of safe, clear vision 24
hours a day.
Peter C. Donshik, MD
Editor-in-Chief
The CLAO Journal