Over the last few years the number of contact lens wearers in the United
States has steadily increased and now stands at over 30 million. The growth
in the contact lens market was made possible by a number of factors including
an increase in the number of contact lens options for patients. Both new
and former contact lens wearers have been attracted by the introduction
of daily disposable contact lenses, the availability of frequent replacement
contact lensesincluding toric and bifocal lensesin a broad
selection of parameters, as well as new silicone hydrogel contact lens
materials. Likewise, there have been important developments in lens care
systems, with the promise of improved efficacy and patient compliance with
these simplified systems.
These developments combined with new strategies to treat contact lens complications
have resulted in an increase in the number of people who can be successfully
fit with contact lenses and has enabled former contact lens failures to
return to lens wear.
The number of refractive surgery procedures has also increased significantly
over the last two years, even though the estimate of 1.5 million LASIK
procedures for the year 2000 has probably not been met. Important developments
in the area of refractive surgery have facilitated its growth. Improvements
in microkeratomes, the introduction of new lasers, and new refractive procedures
have resulted in expanded parameters, improved results, and decreased complications.
Future advances will result in improving and maximizing patient outcome
with better predictability and even fewer complications.
Are these two well-proven modalities of vision correction truly in competition?
Or are they complementary? If one looks at the demographics, our contact
lens wearers are younger and predominately female, while the refractive
surgical patient is older (average age: 3540 years), and fairly evenly
split between males and females. There are individuals who prefer to have
their vision corrected by nonsurgical modalities and would only consider
contact lenses or glasses. On the other hand, there are individuals who
do not want to be dependent on contact lenses and/or glasses and are looking
for a more permanent means to correct their vision. In addition, there
are individuals who may move from one modality to the other, first utilizing
contact lenses, but then considering the possibility of refractive surgery
as they get older and start to experience problems or discomfort with their
contact lenses. Furthermore, there are patients who have had refractive
surgery, but still need some form of vision correction, either full-time
or on an intermittent basis. Most published statistics for LASIK report
85100% of the patients achieve 20/40 vision but only 6580%
achieve 20/20.1,2 Thus, many of these patients may still need a pair of
glasses or even contact lenses for a specific visual task such as driving
at night. In addition, since we are dealing with many patients who are
over 40, even with a monovision surgical procedure, they may still need
reading glasses for certain tasks.
Thus, as comprehensive ophthalmologists we should refrain from considering
refractive surgery and contact lenses as two competing modalities and offer
our patients both options, as well as glasses. By gaining the expertise
in all three areasspectacles, contact lenses, and refractive surgerywe
can better discus the various options and then recommend the selected method
of vision correction to meet the needs of our patients. This approach will
better serve our patients and create a more loyal bond with them. Gaining
the necessary expertise to achieve this goal is within the reach of all
comprehensive ophthalmologists.
Attending the CLAO Annual Meeting is one way to either start the process
or to continue one's education. This year's Annual Meeting has expanded
the educational opportunities for physicians and their staffs at all experience
levels in the areas of contact lenses, optical dispensing, practice management,
and refractive surgery. I look forward to seeing you in Las Vegas.
Peter C. Donshik, MD
Editor in Chief
The CLAO Journal
References
1. Waring GO, Carr JD, Stulting RD, et al: Prospective randomized comparison
of simultaneous and sequential bilateral laser in situ keratomileusis for
the correction of myopia. Ophthalmology 1999;106:732-738
2. Montes M, Chayet A, Gomez L, et al: Laser in situ keratomileusis for
myopia of 1.50 to 6.00 diopters. J Refract Surg 1999;15:106-110.